Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Establish the emergency planning context and framework
  2. Develop agreed planning processes and methodology
  3. Undertake research and analysis for emergency management planning
  4. Develop/refine emergency managementplanning outcomes
  5. Document the emergency plan
  6. Validate the plan
  7. Develop/refine emergency management planning outcomes

Required Skills

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level required for this unit

Required Skills

build and maintain effective networks and relationships across multiple agencies or organisations

communicate effectively in writing

define and provide recommendations to solve problems

facilitate group work

manage complex projects

undertake research and analysis

use effective interpersonal communication skills

work with and consult stakeholders

work cooperatively

write clearly concisely using accurate terminology

Required Knowledge

Fundamentals of risk management included in Australian Standard ASNZS ISO Risk managementPrinciples and guidelines

Fundamentals of emergency management planning included in Australian Emergency Management Manual Emergency Planning

culture diversity and history of communities environments and associated concerns issues and sensitivities perception of risks

current stateterritoryagency emergency management plans

planning process and the impact outcomes and benefits for stakeholders

relevant emergency risk management terminology concepts and principles

relevant jurisdictional emergency management arrangements

research toolsmethodologies for geographic demographic and economic research

group dynamics strategies for team building and resolving conflict

meeting procedures

Evidence Required

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria Required Skills and Knowledge the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Assessment must confirm the ability to

explain the emergency planning process

develop an appropriate and sustainable emergency planning process in cooperation with planning teamgroup and stakeholders

work with planning teamgroup and stakeholders to develop plans that are readily usable and able to be implemented effectively

develop emergency plans that have stakeholder approval and support

evaluate planning process and outcomes with stakeholders

Consistency in performance

Competency should be demonstrated in at least two multiagency contexts with a diverse stakeholder group one of which may be simulated

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Competency should be assessed making significant contributions to an emergency planning process either as an individual or as the representative of a stakeholder organisation or constituency in the workplace or in a simulated workplace environment

Specific resources for assessment

Access is required to

organisational community

opportunity to participate in an actual or simulated emergency planning process

Method of assessment

In a public safety environment assessment is usually conducted via direct observation in a training environment or in the workplace via subject matter supervision andor mentoring which is typically recorded in a competency workbook

Assessment is completed using appropriately qualified assessors who select the most appropriate method of assessment

Assessment may occur in an operational environment or in an industryapproved simulated work environment Forms of assessment that are typically used include

direct observation

interviewing the candidate

journals and workplace documentation

third party reports from supervisors

written or oral questions


Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Drivers may include:

changes in community characteristics

changes in legislation, policies and disaster/emergency management plans

changes in insurance policies and premiums

new sources of risk or changed perception of risk

planning deficiencies

recent emergency incident reports/debriefs, safety issues

recent judicial decisions

changes in strategic and corporate plans

Considerations that may impact on the planning framework may include:

arrangements specified in legislation

organisational or jurisdictional emergency risk management policies or procedures

existing disaster plans, agreements or memoranda of understanding

local planning regulations, development controls and environmental plans

Stakeholders may include:

staff

client groups

decision makers

members of the public

community groups

industry groups

public and private sector organisations

non-government organisations

elected officials

Emergency plans may include:

plans developed to address specific risks

plans required by commonwealth/state/territory legislation

plans required by regulators and permit conditions

Practical constraints may include:

arrangements, roles and responsibilities set down in existing emergency management plans

availability of technical expertise, technology, equipment

budgets, time, availability and capability of people

land use planning

legislation covering emergency management, environmental management, safety standards, local government regulations

limited community knowledge of emergency management planning processes and benefits

political, social and cultural considerations

Research tools may include:

affinity analysis

brainstorming, visioning

cause and effect analysis, force field analysis

emergency risk management process and tools

SWOT analysis

bow-tie analysis

cost:benefit analysis

Community information may include:

characteristics of natural, social, economic and built environments

demographics (population distribution, social, cultural, health status and education data)

details of key infrastructure and emergency/support services

economic activity reports (employment, products, services, revenue)

government reports (such as environmental impacts)

emergency risk assessment studies

Risks may include:

commercial and legal relationships

economic systems and relationships

human behaviour

natural events

built environment failures

disease (plant, animal or human)

political circumstances

technology/technical issues, management activities and controls